- Anyone could become The One, if he had got a gun, with bullets, of course. -
Before watching the movie, I thought it would be another typical, boring, so-called masterpiece, which was soon approved to be wrong. I’d like to appraise it highly as one of the greatest Noir comedies, while it turns out to be commonly categorized as Thriller. About a decade ago, I recommended "The Sixth Sense" to others by highlighting it as a touching Drama, yet everybody else seemed to label it as Horror. Apparently, I’m not good at identifiying the nature of things.
Adults are killed by youngsters, whom were then killed by enfants. Where have all the flowers (babies) gone? Will they jump out of their cradles and go to kill the enfants in the next episode? Fine, this is not a drama, and no chance for sequal production is seen. Yet the answer to the question remains open. In this city, no one’s life is granted away from slaughter. To kill; or to be killed, – the number of options is so limited sometimes. And it often won’t take too long for the majority to make a choice. Honestly, unless on stage, nobody wants to live as Hamlet, being bothered by simple questions such as "To be, or not to be". After all, to become a killer is as simple as any routine exercise in our daily life. And it is the most essential step one needs to take on the way of becoming the god of the city. So, why hesitate?
"I steal, I take drug and I kill so I am a real man", a lad is proud of himself as such. A number of children have made appearance on the scene. Nevertheless none of them looks one’s age, only except for the moment that the little blonde, who had been shot on his toe, began to wail loudly. Only at that instant, he had forgotton everything about the proud and nerve a bandit should hold. He was full of fear so that nothing else could inhabite his mind. And that’s how a kid’s brain should work: single-minded, concentrated, pure and simple.
All leads to the ultimate question: if one kills just to keep oneself alive, will the killing be considered as sinful as it is used to be? Maybe this is a too general form to accquire much responses, yet not none at all. On my lovely great homeland, self-defense claimed in death is not defined as crime by law, which I interpret as an implication to the proposition that self-interest is natuaral and appropriate. Two years ago, I had submitted an essay on the same topic to my Philosophy teacher. Now I am unable to recall any single sentence I had written down on the night before deadline. But I am so convinced that my standpoint has never altered.
NO FAKING PLEASE.